Sound Blaster Audigy Zsstatic

ADMINISTRATION JURISDICTION !!!!!!!!!!!!

Vico Equense - A Seiano the occupation of public land becomes a detective story. Metropolis newspaper this morning deals with gaffes and economic losses resulting from failures of the administration. After months of waiting for a response by the municipality, called to express their views on the request for installation of the benches on the sidewalk along the waterfront of Sejanus, and a sentence of Tar that has forced the municipality to decide as the manager of the tourism and state property, after a blatant gaffes, he discovered that his office could not give the occupation of public land because the area in fact is already granted to the Mayor. Yes, the dealer would Gennaro Five in the area since 2008 were initiated and implemented the work in Marina d'Equa. Amazing timing adds Metropolis. For months, no response was forwarded to applicants, holders of the "Cafe del Mare" by creating damage and inconvenience to the task. Failure to respond to requests for grant funds to municipalities has cost € 1,500 in legal fees to be paid - as laid down by the Tar - to counsel entrepreneurs. There is, then, the bill that the Board will dismiss your attorney. Can not ask the Director-General of the operator of an executive in six months has not commented on a simple question of occupying land public, creating a de facto loss of revenue Ente? Possible that the fees paid by the taxpayers should be wasted in offices because you can not fulfill the simplest of practices? The story takes on grotesque tones when the manager of the state property, after the ruling of the Tar, the bar owners to send a letter, explaining that he could not grant permission to occupy public because the request involves only the public sidewalk which is with the road section, citing art. 20 of Law 285/92. One explanation could be accepted if it were not based on obvious errors. The law cited above, refers to population centers, while Marina d'Equa falls in areas of historical and environmental significance, for which you apply a different article of the law. In pointing out these gaffes was the Cafe of the office of the Ocean.