How To Get Horse To Round Over Jumps

The Court of Appeals has undermined all the foundations of Calciopoli

The Court of Appeals has undermined all the foundations of Calciopoli
'THE DRAW arbitration was not rigged. " This is the ruling by the Court of Appeal of Rome, called to decide on appointment of Borriello from Bergamo and Pairetto. It 's a resounding decision (which confirms the previous Court of Rome), curiously ignored by the media and the Palace of football. We take into account that already the Federal Court that condemned Juve to B with less than 17 points in his ruling wrote that emerged was not the responsibility of Moggi and De Santis in relation to Juventus matches under investigation, and, in general, he closed the speech ( pages 70 and 71) saying that there was no evidence to suggest that there was aimed at determining the alteration of the season for Juventus.
The media lynching against Juve was based on the fact that the investigation of Naples, and then the process staged by the Football Federation, said that the draw was rigged. If it was not, explaining how the Court and the Court of Appeal of Rome, and already understand the ruling left Federal Court, the "process" was thus based on nothing but the desire to eliminate the strongest team. This has been achieved in any event. Juve, probably in 2006-07 would have won its 30th league title was thrown in B, was induced to sell seven of its samples, and is now back to A to try and get a 4th place for the Champions .
Perhaps at this point the FIGC can also afford to restore the truth and the light the judgments of the judiciary to review the Roman grotesque work of summer 2006, culminating in what he called Enzo Biagi "A crazy ruling based on nothing." Not that the news of this goes by the Football Association of the ancient investigators Carraro management is a very good signal. However we hope that chaired by FIGC Spruce recognizes its interest in reviewing the farce of Calciopoli spontaneously (or should we wait for a ruling by the European Court is forced to do so?) In the name of law and human rights defense. And even in the name of the credibility of the league. According to the decisions of the summer 2006 the cream of the referee was pilloried. The arbitrators in business hours (designated by the ever-innocent Hill), especially in matches with Juventus, but not limited to those, operate under very difficult psychological, called to demonstrate in slow motion to be more precise and, above all, more "independent" of their predecessors. If the draw was not rigged and the referees were not corrupt, as I assure the Court of Appeal, then there would be nothing left to prove, but there would only arbitrate the best of their ability.
Tuttosport is the only newspaper that has licenses to open a sober debate on this perspective. Not only and not so much in the interest of the FIGC and Juventus. But in the interests of football.
Paul Bertinetti