Friday, November 9, 2007

Fatigued Hard To Swallow Stiff Neck

"Dicette" Enzo Biagi

The Enzo Biagi, who was recalled today

How To Get Horse To Round Over Jumps

The Court of Appeals has undermined all the foundations of Calciopoli

The Court of Appeals has undermined all the foundations of Calciopoli
'THE DRAW arbitration was not rigged. " This is the ruling by the Court of Appeal of Rome, called to decide on appointment of Borriello from Bergamo and Pairetto. It 's a resounding decision (which confirms the previous Court of Rome), curiously ignored by the media and the Palace of football. We take into account that already the Federal Court that condemned Juve to B with less than 17 points in his ruling wrote that emerged was not the responsibility of Moggi and De Santis in relation to Juventus matches under investigation, and, in general, he closed the speech ( pages 70 and 71) saying that there was no evidence to suggest that there was aimed at determining the alteration of the season for Juventus.
The media lynching against Juve was based on the fact that the investigation of Naples, and then the process staged by the Football Federation, said that the draw was rigged. If it was not, explaining how the Court and the Court of Appeal of Rome, and already understand the ruling left Federal Court, the "process" was thus based on nothing but the desire to eliminate the strongest team. This has been achieved in any event. Juve, probably in 2006-07 would have won its 30th league title was thrown in B, was induced to sell seven of its samples, and is now back to A to try and get a 4th place for the Champions .
Perhaps at this point the FIGC can also afford to restore the truth and the light
the judgments of the judiciary to review the Roman grotesque work of summer 2006, culminating in what he called Enzo Biagi "A crazy ruling based on nothing." Not that the news of this goes by the Football Association of the ancient investigators Carraro management is a very good signal. However we hope that chaired by FIGC Spruce recognizes its interest in reviewing the farce of Calciopoli spontaneously (or should we wait for a ruling by the European Court is forced to do so?) In the name of law and human rights defense. And even in the name of the credibility of the league. According to the decisions of the summer 2006 the cream of the referee was pilloried. The arbitrators in business hours (designated by the ever-innocent Hill), especially in matches with Juventus, but not limited to those, operate under very difficult psychological, called to demonstrate in slow motion to be more precise and, above all, more "independent" of their predecessors. If the draw was not rigged and the referees were not corrupt, as I assure the Court of Appeal, then there would be nothing left to prove, but there would only arbitrate the best of their ability.
Tuttosport is the only newspaper that has licenses to open a sober debate on this perspective. Not only and not so much in the interest of the FIGC and Juventus. But in the interests of football.

Paul Bertinetti

Can I Sell Gold To Mustafa In Singapore

always there. . .

BEFORE THE CASSANDRA AND NOW THE Untouchable
Giancarlo Padovan

D
fter Juventus-Inter, as the game which sealed the top of the league is more balanced than they wanted the ritual pre-season predictions, I can not but wonder where they got the first hour of doomsday and what they said or written in Turin now if, instead of a couple of eggs at the windows of the Inter coach, we were faced with a morning line of police who spoke to the wounded, bruised, arrests, vandalism, damage. In short, the entire sampler of scenes from urban warfare. I'm in journalism for too many years (almost thirty) for not knowing that if only something had happened more than anything recorded by the prefect of Turin, Goffredo Sottile, the dock would be finished with him, we also sports newspaper. Instead, not only was right, the Prefect (by the way, congratulations on your courageous choice that we restart to normal after the season of extreme emergency), but even a player praised Buffon as exemplary, a game just ended, the sense of responsibility of the media and, in particular, the paper printed in approaching and presenting the event. Of course, it would be too much for me to claim that some newspapers and some general links too casual publicly apologized (with
Tuttosport and me) as written in the past. As a citizen and a journalist, I just feared for months that the apocalypse were nothing more than a thesis without reason and content. Enough for me that Juve-Inter was playing without provocation (apart from Ibrahimovic), played in an atmosphere at least acceptable in and outside the stadium, absolutely fair in the field (and fair play for Ranieri to exonerate Julio Cesar has illuminated the evening). I am sorry, however, and very, Massimo Moratti who accused Nedved for the foul cost the serious injury to Figo. For me, it is unfair to the president of Inter and Juventus player completely off the road in the evaluation of the episode. The invitation to review the images and, possibly, to listen to the commentary of Giuseppe Bergomi (Sky) on whose faith and skill I think even he has to complain.
I saw that no one is truly his clothes for the penalty not awarded to Del Piero: belt and its sinking at the hands of Cordoba. Yet - I make a synthesis of
Corriere dello Sport / Stadio and Gazzetta dello Sport - has remained something of that address more than a doubt. I do not imagine what would have happened if the referee had awarded the penalty Rocchi at Juve, but if one like it - we have made against Cruz - had refused to Inter. Still, some members of the critical Italian football does not have the slightest shame in saying that Juve hear complain about the referees (as happened after the sack of Naples, with a composure even excessive) is surreal. Well, Juve is wrong regardless. It sounds like a joke, but to think there are many. Especially now that is up there in good company.
______________
Tuesday - 06:11:07

Friday, September 28, 2007

Wedding Seating Scroll Template

Sahara

Pravda pink
So. The Milan prosecutors asked the trial of the directors of two Milanese teams for false accounting, one of which (the one that never wins) would not have been able to register for the league and a former board member gave her a table. The president of this team, at the time of the budget in accordance with the Public Prosecutor has been distorted, it was Massimo Moratti. Thus, the prosecutors withdrew the position Moratti, buckshot-loaded on board of the team. As the headline on the front page, Pravda pink? Asked the prosecution to Galliani, filed Moratti. Hey presto.
other journalists, athletes or not, are not so ridiculous, but even those who do not hide the news (but still inside pages) write that on the sport than the two teams are likely some point penalty and a possible straparlano prescription. This despite the Sporting Code Articles 7 and 13 describe the administrative offense similar and parallel tort sports (the one with lots of freedom has been attributed to Juventus last year) and requires exactly the same sanctions (ie withdrawal badges and relegation). The requirement, the wearers of the fan trick is this: cheating in the sale of players, if you were cheating, occurred in 2003 and sporting are prescribed. But the offense, if offense was, it was configured at the time of presentation of the budget, thanks to which the second team in Milan has entered the league the following year. This one also knows the first-year law student, but the piles of sand ruggieri of doves and white cane that will cover the whole world.
C. Rocca (The Leaf-Blog) September 25